{"id":3259,"date":"2025-02-23T18:58:18","date_gmt":"2025-02-23T18:58:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/?p=3259"},"modified":"2025-02-23T18:58:18","modified_gmt":"2025-02-23T18:58:18","slug":"moscow-is-the-third-rome-time-to-activate-the-doctrine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/2025\/02\/23\/moscow-is-the-third-rome-time-to-activate-the-doctrine\/","title":{"rendered":"Moscow Is the Third Rome \u2013 Time to Activate the Doctrine"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>By Ishtwan Kamel<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>23\/02\/2025<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Tikhon, the Metropolitan of Simferopol and the Crimean Peninsula, has openly declared his imperial ambitions and demands control of Istanbul. This constitutes an attack on Turkey and its sovereignty.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>*Moscow is the Third Rome (\u2018Third Rome\u2019) &#8211; theological, historiosophic and political concept that claims that Moscow is the successor of the Roman Empire and Byzantium (auth. Wikipedia)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1004\" height=\"653\" src=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-11.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3260\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-11.png 1004w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-11-300x195.png 300w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-11-768x500.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1004px) 100vw, 1004px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Moscow is no longer hiding its imperial ambitions. The Russian Church has begun to call for Constantinople to return. Citing the need to return &#8216;historical&#8217; territories, the priests support revanchism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Kremlin&#8217;s manipulation of the history of Byzantium as a justification for its claims to Istanbul is not a religious debate. This is not a religious discussion as well, but a direct political statement aimed at aggravating the international situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Theses in line with the Kremlin&#8217;s policy are increasingly being expressed by Russian religious leaders. It is becoming a systemic phenomenon to use the church to spread imperial ideas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"985\" height=\"695\" src=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-12.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3261\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-12.png 985w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-12-300x212.png 300w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-12-768x542.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 985px) 100vw, 985px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Political propaganda through the clergy has become an instrument that Russia uses. The ideas of the return of Istanbul expressed by the clergy are part of a wider imperial doctrine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Russian priests are saying that Istanbul should become a part of a &#8216;new Byzantium&#8217; under the control of Moscow. These are not just fanatical ideas, but reflect the real plans of the Russian elites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Using religion to justify aggressive intentions is a standard Kremlin technique.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Calls for a revision of the current borders are increasingly coming from Russian church circles. They justify expansionism by appealing to religious ideas and historical narratives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Church in Russia is fully integrated into state policy. It is no longer an independent religious institution, but an important element of the Kremlin&#8217;s propaganda machine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Kremlin uses the Church to legitimise its aggressive foreign policy. Istanbul is becoming another point in its geopolitical games.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The priests of Moscow already feel that they are masters of a new Byzantium.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"987\" height=\"599\" src=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-13.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3262\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-13.png 987w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-13-300x182.png 300w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-13-768x466.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 987px) 100vw, 987px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Russia&#8217;s geopolitical ideas are increasingly based on historical manipulation. A parallel reality in which all its neighbours are its &#8216;historical territories&#8217; is being created by the Kremlin and the Russian Orthodox Church.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Russian government&#8217;s use of the church as a vehicle for the promotion of its interests abroad. This is part of the building of support for imperial ideas among the faithful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Russian priests are spreading theories that justify aggression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is a unity between the Russian Church and the State. The Kremlin&#8217;s ideological attitude is reflected in all statements by the clergy justifying aggressive policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"974\" height=\"699\" src=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-14.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3263\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-14.png 974w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-14-300x215.png 300w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-14-768x551.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 974px) 100vw, 974px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A long-standing Kremlin technique is to create an image of the enemy. Now, the Russian clergy has joined the information war with its negative image of Turkey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&nbsp;These are not just individual statements &#8211; they are part of a strategy to prepare public opinion for new conflicts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It aims to strengthen control over neighbouring countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"981\" height=\"656\" src=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-15.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3264\" srcset=\"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-15.png 981w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-15-300x201.png 300w, https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-15-768x514.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 981px) 100vw, 981px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Putin is haunted by the lavras of Catherine II, who wanted to revive the Byzantine Empire. The Russian clergy is encroaching on Istanbul and dreaming of a new &#8216;crusade&#8217; in the Middle East.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Russia will not stop at Ukraine. Istanbul is the next object of its interest. While the Kremlin prepares, Turkey has to decide on a preventive response to the Russian menace.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Ishtwan Kamel 23\/02\/2025 Tikhon, the Metropolitan of Simferopol and the Crimean Peninsula, has openly declared his imperial ambitions and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-asia"],"views":819,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3259"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3259\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3265,"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3259\/revisions\/3265"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopolitic.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}